What do Sikh traditions have to do with this case?published at 19:19 BST
Aleem Maqbool
Religion editor
When it comes to UK law prohibiting the carrying of knives and blades in public, there is a clear exemption for kirpans. But the killing of Henry Nowak has led to some debate on the issue.
Kirpans are usually curved, ceremonial knives worn by Sikhs as one of the five physical symbols of their faith - along with long hair, a comb, a steel bracelet and cotton underclothes. They are kept close to the body in a sheath and strap (gatra), and while there's no specification as to how long a kirpan should be, Sikh groups in the UK advise people to choose small blades (of around three to six inches) when worn in public.
More than anything, they are meant to be a symbolic reminder to Sikhs to protect the weak and uphold righteousness.
In the case of Vickrum Digwa, the Southampton attacker, Sikh groups issued clarification that he was carrying two blades on the night of the murder: a small kirpan worn around his neck and a second, much longer knife worn outside his clothing that was used to fatally stab Nowak.
They said Digwa's claim that he had carried the longer knife for religious reasons was false.
During the trial, the prosecution team referred to the murder weapon as a "shastar", the Punjabi word for knife, and also dismissed Digwa's claim of carrying it having been a religious obligation. While the trial judge did not refer to Digwa's longer knife as a "kirpan", he did call it a "large Sikh dagger".
Nevertheless, the case has led to some calls for the wearing of the kirpan to be banned.
Groups like the Sikh Federation say that British Sikhs understand the responsibilities that come with the privilege of wearing a kirpan and that once one is drawn, it is no longer legal but also no longer considered to be a kirpan.












