Police chiefs' council listening to 'legitimate concerns' on anti-racism guidelinespublished at 19:49 BST
Harry Farley
Political correspondent
Image source, House of CommonsAs we've been reporting, a source close to the Home Secretary has said that a police anti-racism commitment is clumsy in its wording.
It comes after the chair of the NPCC, Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, said he was listening to "legitimate concerns" about how a document outlining anti-racism commitments are "worded or phrased".
"Where needed we can and will make changes, but this should not detract from the intent, which is to improve the quality of policing," he said.
Sources close to Shabana Mahmood said it was right the language is reviewed to ensure there is no ambiguity.
It comes after the shadow home secretary Chris Philp raised concerns about the document, which is produced by the NPCC and College of Policing.
He highlighted a section that said producing equality of policing outcomes for people of different ethnic groups "does not mean treating everyone 'the same' or being 'colour blind'".
"The police Anti Racism Commitment is divisive, immoral and dangerous," he said.
"Criminals are not being properly policed and the public endangered as a result. It is wrong that people are treated differently based on the colour of their skin, which is what the document requires," he added.
"Everyone should simply be treated the same regardless of race. We cannot have a society divided along religious or racial lines."












