Historic peace talks between US and Iran must bridge deep distrustpublished at 01:23 BST
Lyse Doucet
Chief international correspondent
If and when a photograph is taken of US Vice President JD Vance standing next to Iran's Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf in Islamabad this weekend, it will make history.
That moment would mark the highest-level face-to-face talks between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America since the 1979 Islamic Revolution shattered their strong strategic bond and cast a long shadow which still darkens relations to this day.
The two men may not smile. They may not even shake hands.
It would not make this troubled relationship any more easy, any less hostile.
But it would send a signal that both sides want to try to end a war sending shocks worldwide, avoid an even riskier escalation, and turn to diplomacy to do a deal.
There's zero chance though of President Donald Trump's optimistic prediction of a "peace deal" within this shaky two-week ceasefire; its terms were contested and broken since the moment it was announced earlier this week.
Even until the eleventh hour, Iranians kept everyone guessing over whether they would still show up while Israel was insisting there would be no ceasefire in Lebanon.
But if serious and sustained talks make a start, it would also mark the most significant push since Trump pulled out of the previous landmark nuclear deal in 2018, during his first term. He dismissed what was widely seen as the foreign policy highlight of the Obama administration as the "worst deal in history".
Read more here from our Chief International Correspondent Lyse Douset who is reporting in Islamabad.
We're going to be moving our live coverage of the peace talks here. Follow along as we bring you the latest.














