bbc.co.uk Navigation

Brown: When I'm PM

  • Nick
  • 13 Dec 05, 05:55 PM

Get unstitching those banners, comrades. Egality, Fraternity, Solidarity won't do any more. They're so 18th century.

Gordon Brown tonight unveils three new words to hold aloft in the fight with the forces of conservatism - Cameron and, whisper who dares, perhaps Blair too. Liberty, Responsibility and Fairness are the three words in question.

In a weighty speech in memory of the late great Hugo Young of the Guardian, the Chancellor argues that "the surest way in which our nation can succeed economically and socially in the 21st century will be by building a society in which there is liberty for all, responsibility by all and fairness to all".

He also begins to outline "ideas that should in my view be the foundation for a new agenda of political, economic, social and constitutional reform, a new settlement that will enable us to face up to the scale and size of the global challenges".

That's code - though not very coded code - for "what I would do when I finally get to be prime minister".

Naturally, as he's not yet PM, Gordon Brown is a little coy about giving us much detail. However, the Chancellor does remind us that in order to underpin liberty he would give Parliament a vote before going to war, complete the reform of the House of Lords and revive local government.

As for responsibility, he points to his recent announcement of funding for the first British youth national community service and says he wants to "energise a new debate on the vital future role of the voluntary charitable and community sector in our country".

Finally, and most importantly, he turns to fairness and makes clear that government and government alone can guarantee - even if they don't provide - childcare and the New Deal's training for the unemployed.

I say that fairness is the most important. That's because it is - in a favourite phrase of his - the real "dividing line" between New Improved New Labour and New Conservatives - between, in other words, Brown and Cameron.

"Britain can retreat," he argues tonight, "into the old narrow view of liberty as a form of libertarianism, responsibility as little more than paternalism, fairness as just formal rights before the law - leaving people and communities not only ill-equipped for challenges ahead, but with too little liberty, too little responsibility, and too little fairness."

Translated, that means that Cameron would not invest in child care, the New Deal or the environment. What though if Cameron says he would? Then Gordon believes that will split the Tories - or be simply less attractive to the public than sticking with the guys who really believe it.

Eleven plus minus

  • Nick
  • 13 Dec 05, 12:40 PM

What a difference a decade makes.

Ten years ago the Labour Party conference was delighted to hear this ringing decaration: "Watch my lips. No selection - by examination or interview." It was the reassurance the party needed to pull back from defeating their leadership (and you can see the video of it right here).


With victory in the bag the man who uttered those words made clear that he hadn't meant to suggest Labour was going to stop the selection going on now. Tush tush. No, he was saying that there'd be no more selection if Labour were elected.

Many in the Labour Party felt betrayed. Wind forward a decade and we find the prime minister standing next to the Education Secretary, Ruth Kelly, declaring that "under Labour there will be no return to selection at the age of 11" - words that have not proved enough to reassure Labour backbenchers including a man called David Blunkett who (yes, you remember it now) uttered the "watch my lips" promise.

Mr Blunkett has, I'm told, made his concerns clear in a series of backbench meetings with Ruth Kelly. He will not, perish the thought, speak out (yet) or rebel, but he wants to "act as an honest broker" between the backbenches and the government to bring about "appropriate concessions".

When it comes to selection, words will clearly no longer do for those who've heard them and even uttered them before.

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

BBC.co.uk